/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) text comprehension (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: text comprehension
Is in goldstandard
1
paper CL_LiteraturayLingüísticatxt540 - : Villalón, R., Merisuo-Storm, T., Izquierdo-Magaldi, B., Melero., A. & Soininen, M. (2016). Reading attitudes and text comprehension of Finnish and Spanish pupils: a comparative study . Ponencia presentanda en Conference of the EARLI SIG 2 Comprehension of Text and Graphics, Geneva, Switzerland. [ [172]Links ]
2
paper CL_LiteraturayLingüísticatxt353 - : Algunos de los problemas que presentaron estas concepciones e investigaciones iniciales relativas a los 'esquemas' mentales, y en específico los 'esquemas de las historias' (story schema) dicen relación con la estructura canónica que postulan (Van den Broek & Gustafson, 1999; Van Dijk, 1999). En efecto, como se aprecia en el análisis planteado en los párrafos anteriores, desde la 'gramática de las historias' se postula que para que una historia sea más comprensible y por ende más fácil de recordar, debe ajustarse al esquema ideal (Mandler & Johnson, 1977), lo que da como resultado una visión bastante estructurada de la comprensión. Al respecto Van Dijk señala: "such an approach was too neat, too structuralistic and seemed to reflect too little the actually ongoing mental processing. A proper theory of text comprehension and production would have to embody the more dynamic, ad hoc, online, tentative nature of understanding" (1999: 392 ).
3
paper corpusRLAtxt226 - : Crossley, Scott, Skalicky, Stephen, Dascalu, Mihai, McNamara, Danielle y Kyle, Kristopher. 2017. Predicting text comprehension, processing, and familiarity in adult readers: New approaches to readability formulas . Discourse Processes, 54(5-6), 340-359. [201]https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1296264 [ [202]Links ]
4
paper corpusSignostxt439 - : Multiple text comprehension: Perspectives and possibilities for transdisciplinary research
5
paper corpusSignostxt550 - : Villalón, R., Merisuo-Storm, T., Izquierdo-Magaldi, B., Melero, A. & Soininen, M. (2016). Reading attitudes and text comprehension of Finnish and Spanish pupils: A comparative study . Ponencia presentada en Conference of the EARLI SIG 2 Comprehension of Text and Graphics, Ginebra, Suiza. [ [248]Links ]
Evaluando al candidato text comprehension:
text comprehension
Lengua:
Frec: 202
Docs: 100
Nombre propio: / 202 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.115 = ( + (1+0) / (1+7.66533591718518)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| text comprehension |
: 18. Kintsch, W. y van Dijk, T. (1978). Towards a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review. 85: 363-394. : 21. Goldman, Susan y Gay Bisanz. 2002. Toward a functional analysis of scientific genres: Implications for understanding and learning processes. En José Otero, José León y Arthur Graesser (eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension, 19-50. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. : 21. Kintsch, W. y van Dijk, T. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394. : 52. Seki, U. (1997). Effects of Itemization and Highlighting Key Words on Text Comprehension. Journal of Japan Society for Educational Technology, 21, 17-20. : Best, R.; Ozuru, Y.; Floyd, R. & McNamara, D. (2006). Children's text comprehension. Effects of genre, knowledge, and text cohesion. En S. Barab, K. Hay, D. Hickey (Eds.) Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Mahwah: Erlbaum. 37-42. : Britt, M., Rouet, J-F., y Durik, A. (2018). Literacy beyond text comprehension. A theory of purposeful reading. Taylor y Francis Group. [207]https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315682860 : Chang, K., Sung, Y., & Chen, I. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5-23. : Dai, D. Y. & Wang, X. (2007). The role of need for cognition and reader beliefs in text comprehension and interest development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 332-347. : Degand, Liesbeth y Sanders, Ted. 2002. The impact of relational markers on expository text comprehension in L1 and L2. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 739-757. [207]https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020932715838 : Florit, Elena y M. Chiara Levorato 2012 "A longitudinal study on listening text comprehension and receptive vocabulary in preschoolers". Rivista di psicolinguistica applicata. 12, 1-2, 65-80. : GRAESSER, A.C. y BOWER, G.H. (Eds) (1990) Inferences and text comprehension. New York: Academy Press. : Gernsbacher, M. & Kaschak, M. (2013). Text comprehension. En D. Reisberg (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology (pp. 462-474). Londres: Oxford University Press. : Geva, Esther. (1992). The role of conjunctions in L2 text comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 26 (4), 731-747. : Glenberg, A., Meyer, M. & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69-83. : Goldman, S. & Bisanz, G. (2002). Toward a functional analysis of scientific genres: Implications for understanding and learning processes. En J. Otero, J.A. León & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 19-50). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. : Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371-395. [117]https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.101.3.371 : Graesser, A. C., Wiemer-Hastings, P., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2001). Constructing inferences and relations during text comprehension. Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects, 2742(901), 249-271. [159]https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.8.14gra : Graesser, A., León, J. A. & Otero J. (2002). Introduction to the psychology of science text comprehension. En J. Otero, J. A. León & A. Graesser (Eds.). The Psycholog y of science text comprehension (pp. 1- 15). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum. : Graesser, A., Singer, M. & T. Trabasso. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 48, 163-189. : Graesser, A.C. & Bower, G. (Eds.) (1990). Inferences and text comprehension. San Diego, CA.: Academic Press. : Graesser, A.C. & Kreuz, R. (1993). A theory of inference generation during text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 16, 145-160. : Graesser, A.C. y Bower, G.H. (Eds.) (1990) Inferences and text comprehension. New York: Academic Press. : Graesser, A.C. y Kreuz, R.J. (1993) A theory of inference generation during text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 16, 145-160. : Graesser, A.C., León, J.A. & Otero, J. (2002). Introduction to the psychology of science text comprehension. En J. Otero, J.A. León & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 1-15). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum. : Graesser, A.C., Singer, M. y Trabasso, T. (1994) Constructing Inferences during Narrative Text Comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 3, 371-395. : Guthrie, John , Allan Wigfield, Jamie Metsala, and Kathleen Cox. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and amount of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 231-56. : Gyselinck, V. & Tardieu, H. (1999). The role of illustrations in text comprehension. En H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 195-218). N. J.: Erlbaum. : Haberlandt, K. & Graesser, A. (1985). Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 357-374. : Kintsch, W. & van Dijk, T. 1978. Toward a Model of Text Comprehension and Production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-391. : Kintsch, W. (1994). Text Comprehension, memory and learning. American Psychologist, 49(4), 294-302. : Kintsch, W. (2002) On the notions of theme and topic in psychological process models of text comprehension. En Louwerse, M. y van Peer, W. (Eds.) Thematics, Interdisciplinary Studies. 157-170. Amsterdam: Benjamins. : Kintsch, W. (2013). Revisiting the construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction. En D. Alvermann, N. Unrau y R. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6.^a ed., pp. 807-839). International Reading Association. : Kintsch, W. y van Dijk, T.A. (1978) Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394. : Kintsch, W., Patel, V. L., y Ericsson, K. A. (1999). The role of long-term working memory in text comprehension. Psychologia, 42(4), 186-198. : Kintsch, W., y Van Dijk, T. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-394. [253]https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363 : Kintsch, Walter e Teun Adrianus Van Dijk. 1978. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 58: 363-394. : Kleijn, Suzanne. 2018. Clozing in on readability: How linguistic features affect and predict text comprehension and on-line processing. Tesis de Doctorado. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University. : León, J.A. & Peñalba, G. (2002). Understanding causality and temporal sequence in scientific discourse. En J. Otero, J.A. León & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 199-221). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum. : León, J.A., Otero, J. & Graesser, A.C. (Eds.) (2002). The psychology of science text comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Lauwrence Erlbaum. : List, A., y Alexander, P. (2017). Analyzing and integrating models of multiple text comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 143-147, [261]https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1328309 : Mannes, S. & St. George, M. (1996). Effects of prior knowledge on text comprehension: A simple modeling approach. En B. Britton & A. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 115-140). Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum. : Martins, I. (2002). Visual imagery in school science texts. En J.C. Otero, J.A. León & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 73-90). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. : Moravcsik, J. E., & Kintsch, W. (1993). Writing quality, reading skills, and domain knowledge as factors in text comprehension. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 360-374. : Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from components skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443-468. [129]https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000008 : Ohlsson, S. (2002). Generating and understanding qualitative explanations. En J. Otero, J.A. León & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 91-128). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum. : Otero, J., León, J. & Graesser, A. (2002). The psychology of science text comprehension. Mahwah, NJ.: Erlbaum. : Parodi, G. & Julio, C. (2017). More than Words: Contending Semiotic Systems and the Role of Disciplinary Knowledge in Specialized Text Comprehension. Ibérica, 33, 11-36. : Roch, M., Florit, E., y Levorato, M. (2011). The advantage of reading over listening text comprehension in Down syndrome: what is the role of verbal memory? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(3), 890-899. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.11.002 : Rouet, J. & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2002). "Mining for meaning": Cognitive effects of inserted questions in learning from scientific text. En J. Otero, J. León & A. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 417-436). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. : Rouet, J. -F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to Web-based learning. Psychology Press. : Seely, M. R. & Long, D. (1994). The Use of Generalized Knowledge Structures in Processing Television News Items. En H.van Oostendorp & R. Zwaan (Eds.), Naturalistic Text Comprehension (pp 149-164). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. : Singer, M. M., & O'Connell, G. 2003. Robust inference processes in expository text comprehension. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15 (4), 607-631. : Singer, M., Harkness, D. & Stewart, S. (1997). Constructing inferences in expository text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 24, 199-228. : Singer, Murray y Zwaan, Rolf. 2003. Text comprehension. En Graesser, Arthur; Gernsbacher, Morton Ann y Goldman, Susan (compiladores). Handbook of discourse processes. Mahwah, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. : Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I. & Britt, M. A. (2010). Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 192-204. : Tapiero, I. & Otero, J. (2002). Situation models as retrieval structures: Effects on the global coherence of science texts. En J. Otero, J. León & A. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 179-198). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. : Trabasso, T. & Magliano, J. (1996). Conscious understanding during text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255-287. : VAN OOSTENDORP, H. y ZWAM, R.A. (Eds) (1994) Naturalistic Text Comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. : Van Dijk, T. A. & Kintsch, W. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychological review,85(5), 363. : Van den Broek, Paul. 1990a. The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. En D. Balota, G. Flores y K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 423-446). Hillsdale, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. : Van den Broek, Paul. 1990b. Causal inferences in the comprehension of narrative texts. En: A. C. Graesser y G.H. Bower (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Inferences and text comprehension (pp.175-194). San Diego, USA: Academic Press. : Wang, Judy huei-yu, and John Guthrie. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, reading frequency, and past reading proficiency on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162-86. : Whitney, P., Ritchie, B., & Clark, M. (1991). Working memory capacity and the use of elaborative inferences in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 14, 133-145. : Yoshimura, F. (2006). Does manipulating foreknowledge of output tasks lead to differences in reading behavior, text comprehension and noticing of language form? Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 419-434. : van den Broek, P. (1990). Causal inferences and the comprehension of narrative text. En A.C. Graesser & G. Bower (Eds.), Inferences and text comprehension (pp. 175-196). San Diego, CA.: Academic Press. : van den Broek, P. (1990). The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. En D. Balota, G. d’Arcais & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 423-445). Hillsdale, N.J.:Erlbaum. |